2006 Portability Study: Portable meals gain ground

Sixty-eight percent of all operators expect their portable sales to increase this year.

Most non-commercial operators provide customers with a variety of portable meal options. For some, grab-and-go is, or is becoming, a way of life, according to FSD's 2005 Portability Study.

College students love their burritos, no question, especially on the West Coast, where burrito stands, taquerias and quick-service Mexican restaurants are as common as pizzerias in New York, coffee bars in Seattle or bratwurst carts in Chicago.

But what does the iPod Generation crave more, food or speed (of service)? At the University of California-Berkeley, it's the latter at the Golden Bear, the largest of four convenience store, like retail units, according to Shawn LaPean, director of CalDining.

Burritos were selling at a 100-a-day clip, LaPean says, but customer counts went up tenfold when staff converted the made-to-order burrito station to a wrap station. "Speed of service is essential," he comments. Golden Bear attracts 5,000 customers daily; with seating for 35, "virtually all business is grab-and-go," he adds.

What holds true for the Golden Bear doesn't quite hold true for the entire non-commercial marketplace, but it's getting there, according to FoodService Director's most recent Business-Builder Study on Portability, which determines the extent to which operators are serving either grab-and-go (pre-packaged), take-out meals (packaged at the time and point of service) or both. B&I is the market leader: 86% sell portable foods, with colleges a close second at 82%.

Trends show that for many wage-earners, the "lunch hour" is a thing of the past and that many employees in a variety of occupational settings work through lunch.


More From FoodService Director

Industry News & Opinion

A new law in Washington will expand Breakfast After the Bell programs throughout the state, the Daily Fly reports.

Signed into law on Wednesday by Gov. Jay Inslee, HB 1508 requires that schools in which at least 70% of students qualify for free or reduced-price meals offer Breakfast After the Bell by the time the 2019-2020 school year begins.

The food offered at breakfast must meet federal nutrition standards and can’t be made up of more than 25% added sugar. Schools must also give preference to food that is fresh and grown in the state.

The breakfast period can...

Industry News & Opinion

The University of Southern California in Los Angeles will begin offering fresh kosher meals three times a week at its USC Village Dining Hall, the Daily Trojan reports.

The meals will be delivered to the dining hall every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday evening by a local kosher butcher beginning March 20. The butcher will also deliver sandwiches, salads and other kosher items to a marketplace on campus.

Around 15 Orthodox students who are on meal plans will be able to enjoy the meals, according to the Daily Trojan. Students can receive their meals at the cashier’s desk in...

Sponsored Content
fish tacos

From High Liner Foods.

Younger consumers are driving an increased focus on sustainability, and more consumers overall are demanding a wider variety of seafood on menus. With shifting interest in seafood, operators need to be familiar with the seafood consumer—who they are, what they’re looking for and when they eat it—to more effectively boost interest in seafood dishes.

Understand consumer habits

Technomic’s 2017 Center of the Plate: Seafood & Vegetarian report finds that 65% of consumers eat seafood at least occasionally (once every 90 days or more), either as an...

Industry News & Opinion

The Missouri House of Representatives has initially approved a bill that would enable students with dietary issues to forgo mandatory meal plans at public colleges and universities, U.S. News reports.

Approved Tuesday, the bill would grant students with medical documentation of food sensitivities, food allergies or medical dietary issues the right to opt out of meal plans.

Supporters of the bill say it will allow students to not have to pay for food they can’t safely eat, while opponents say that the bill will negatively impact schools financially. According to legislative...

FSD Resources